Please excuse me for top-posting. I'll change the names t follow
gost_gc256b pattern, add documentation and submit v4.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
ср, 15 янв. 2020 г., 19:17 Niels Möller <ni...@lysator.liu.se>:
> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbarysh...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> > +const struct ecc_curve *nettle_get_gc256b(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > + return &_nettle_gc256b;
> >> > +}
> >>
> >> Would it make sense to add "gost" to this name, in similar position as
> >> "secp" in other curves?
> >
> > I don't think so. Consider the names from "TLS Supported Groups"
> registry.
>
> I still think it would be appropriate with some more context for the
> Nettle name, just "gc256b" is a bit too terse and obscure. Try doing a
> web search for it. Some alternatives:
>
> nettle_get_gost_gc256b
> nettle_get_gost_curve_256b
> nettle_get_tls_gc256b
>
> I can merge the support as is, but it would be good to agree on name
> before release (and perhaps before adapting the gnutls code, to avoid
> another renaming hassle there).
>
> Regards,
> /Niels
>
> --
> Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677.
> Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
>
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
