I created a couple of merge requests in the repo, with those MRs merged I think the powerpc code is stable to be included in the upcoming version of nettle.
regards, Mamone On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:28 PM Maamoun TK <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder which assembly files we should use if target host is aarch64, >> but ABI=32? I guess the arm/v6/ code can be used unconditionally. Can >> we also use arm/neon/ code unconditionally? >> > > It seems gcc for aarch64 doesn't support building 32-bit binaries, maybe > we should remove the check of ABI since 64-bit is the only option. I tried > adding arm/v6 and arm/neon unconditionally, both yield a bunch of errors > such as the integer register is r4 instead of w4 or x4 plus getting a few > unknown mnemonics. > > Do you agre with aiming for a release pretty soon, including the new >> powerpc64 code, but no aarch64 code? >> > > Isn't starting a new version with both powerpc64 and aarch64 changes is > more reasonable? I'm not sure here, if there are a few commits before > powerpc64 patches then it makes sense to wrap up the current version with > powerpc64 code. It's up to you to decide, you can also consider an AES > modes optimizations for S390x arch which I'll drop its patch in the next > few days. > > regards, > Mamone > _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
