On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:42 PM Simo Sorce <[email protected]> wrote: > you added the standard GNU License to these files, but the repository > you mention has no license at all (red flag), and looking at the code > it points to on which these files are "based" the current license if > ASL 2.0 > > How much are your patches "based" on the SHA-Intrinsic source? >
I've written the patch from scratch while keeping in mind how to use the SHA-1 instructions of Arm64 crypto extension from sha1-arm.c in Jeffrey's repository. I've Cced Jeffrey in the main message to get his input on this patch. regards, Maamoun _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
