On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:04 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > //Quoting Gora Mohanty gora at srijan.in > Wed Jul 8 01:24:38 PDT 2009 > > However, at the same time we must move towards an agreed-upon > structure for FOSSCOMM. My preference at the moment would be > for an informal body without a legal existence, which exists > largely through this list and a website.// > > I agree on that it has to be an informal body but disagree on it to be > confined to this list and a website particularly in Indian Context. > > We need three to five "full timers" working on the evolution of FOSSCOM, > with support from Organizations in building this (say for One Year). Are > people from IT for Change of this kind? These people should be in a > position to be contacted at least 5X8 over phone on issues related to > FOSSCOM. >
I feel this is too early to proceed like this , it might take few years atleast for the FOSSCOMM to mature > > They have to travel across the nation create Local Groups (that should > deepen to districts of States, allow them to discuss among themselves and > get back within a stipulated time frame), take their opinions, co-ordinate > with experienced people here and finally arrive at a Structure. > > -- > > Aamachu > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > network mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in >
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
