I am looking for those spirited and resourceful individuals who, believe
that time has come for a grand netbased learning platform based on open
educational resources.

I am putting forth some ideas , and wish to get comments, but more
importantly wish to get partners.


   1. A commercially viable open platform for learning is needed.
   2. Learning , though largely using web-resources, may use blended ( mix
   of online and offline) mode
   3. Should ride on the content like OCW of MIT, NPTEL of IITs ,
   www.curriki.org, www.amser.org, www.cnx.org, ccl.northwestern.edu ,
   flexbook etc etc and host of FOSS sites.
   4. Content may be video or other wise.
   5. Content may be multilingual : the platform should be used to create
   translations where needed, in a sustainable way.
   6. Something like this is taking shape at IGNOU ( ODTEL) but its fate is
   determined by the governmental institution like IGNOU. How open will it be,
   not sure.
   7. It may offers to register students, institutions and teachers or
   mentors
   8. A good model : www.testminister.com
   9. Those who wish to provide services may put up their tariff. some may
   offer free courses.
   10. Those service providers who wish to quote third party accreditation,
   including affiliations to university or boards etc,may do so.
   11. The platform may vouch for authenticity of service provider if it has
   adequate system to do so, but , by default may not do so , and all this,
   loudly, visibly  openly.
   12. This training may include FOSS skills, regular courses as open
   school, support for niche subjects
   13. To the extent formal educational institutes can be involved, their
   certification and diploma could be offered.
   14. It should be offered on collaborative LMS like moodle or Sakai or ??
   15. It should have tests ( self tests)  that determine stages of
   proficiency of the learner
   16. There should be a set of mentors who may charge for their time. Their
   abilities should be visible through the website.
   17. They may charge differentially.
   18. Revenue models may be many. A certain (fixed ?) share of revenue be
   taken by the facilitating site. Say 20%
   19. Of this 20%, at least 5% be DONATED to either blender3d or FSFINDIA.

jitendra
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to