On Wednesday 14 April 2010 07:31 PM, renuka prasad wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:38 PM, H.S.Rai <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mohit Singh
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> The REAL fight is in first and second year of technical courses
where
> kanetkar books as well as Turbo C++ rules. Once the mindset of
> students and faculty members is set with TC
It is more faculty members and syllabus. External examiner (in case
some faculty member conduct lab with g++) will upset by seeing header
files without .h or not mention of conio.h
yes it is more of faculty and syllabus.
+1
we at our institution will tell the external examiner that we have
done labs only using gcc/g++/openjdk etc on GNU Linux only , and also
we will show them how easily we man manage and secure networks using
GNU/Linux and what other benefits that has led us to do the stuff on
GNU/Lunux. may times the external examiner will think that it is great
to work on GNU ?linux and will not bother to look into too much of
details .also many have requested to help in setting up such lab at
their place , so though it may take time there will be a day in which
"Let us see gcc / g++ " books will be printed and that time people
like kanitkar will also join the movement.
I had similar experiences.
I have been personally involved in orienting many colleges in
Maharashtra to GNU/Linux and in all those colleges, particularly SNDT,
Somaya and KC college of engineering, they do teach c and not Turbo c.
Not to mention they use gcc and also do all their lab assignments for
Java in gnu/linux.
And I have been one of the externals for final year project assessment
in many ENG colleges and my co examiners in many cases were rather super
impressed than getting upset.
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
