On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:21 AM, sankarshan <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Mohit Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > IMHO, SchoolOS interface should be easier like Mac or Nokia Phones. If > > we try to put as much packages as possible, they user may bounce back > > and call it complicated. > > You are entering the zone of whether to make it application oriented > (ie. software package Foo does this) or, task oriented (ie. draw an > apple) > > true all the research is done by MIT and OLPC was result, sometimes i feel we are duplicating some of the tasks that has already been done , but ofcouse not all tasks are done using OLPC > > The user should be able to get and install new packages from a > > location on net. It should also be a simple interface and it must tell > > the user what a particular program does as well as how can a > > particular type of application may be searched easily. > > Actually, if you factor in off-internet bits, the ability to design > becomes much more interesting. > > -- > sankarshan mukhopadhyay > <http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog> > _______________________________________________ > network mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in >
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
