On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Nagarjuna G <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Pranesh Prakash <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > By Ryan Paul from Ars Technica:
> > http://j.mp/d11PU9
> >
> > At the Linux Foundation's annual LinuxCon event this week, Columbia
> > University law professor and Software Freedom Law Center founder Eben
> > Moglen explained that prospects for software patent reform are bleak and
> > that the time has come for the free software community to start finding
> > ways to solve its patent problems by using the patent system itself.
> >
>
> Isn't this a good news to lawyers  :-)
>
> This is not a solution to the problem.  The cause of the problem is
> the denial of the fundamental right to the citizens to be creative.
> We need to claim this right.
>

I agree with you here. This is an argument that has not yet been articulated
by our community.

>
> As a freedom fighter I see that the time has come to look for what is
> patented or patentable and publish multiple versions of the software
> that implements the patent and make the patenting system defunct.
>

In the case of software, this is already the case. There are an estimated
200,000 software patents in the US, around 4,500 patents on e-commerce and
11,000 patents on online shopping. Any software that is used easily violates
many of these patents. More on my blog at:

http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/11/practical-problem-with-software-patents.html

For more detailed reading, Bessen and Meurer's research is probably one of
the best. They have a web site at:

http://researchoninnovation.org/

Their book, "Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers
Put Innovators at Risk" is a very important read. Some of its chapters are
available at:

http://researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork/

Venky
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to