On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:17 PM, jtd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 10 September 2010 20:27:31 A. Mani wrote: > >> http://www.ilug-cal.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id= >>165&Itemid=36 > > Some quibbles in the interest of accuracy > "The latter is basically software with no associated license and hence > can in principle be exploited by proprietary closed source software > producers and patent trolls" > > Patent trolls cant exploit public domain software as it would count as > prior art.
No, many do their homework before proceeding on their plan. They will know about the difficulty of proving similarities. Best A. Mani -- A. Mani ASL, CLC, AMS, CMS http://www.logicamani.co.cc _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
