2012/3/14 Guru गुरु <[email protected]>

> **
>
> On 14/03/12 07:58, Nagarjuna G wrote:
>
>
>
> 2012/3/13 Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) <[email protected]>
>
>> On Tuesday 13 Mar 2012, Sunil Abraham wrote:
>> > Apologies for posting a job notice on this list. But since it has
>> > policy implications - I hope you will forgive me.
>> >
>> > DIT is looking for a TCO study between FOSS and proprietary software
>> > at the district level. CIS has promised to undertake this study for
>> > them.
>>
>>  There are 5 types of lies, increasing in degree in order of naming:
>>
>> - Lies
>> - Damned lies
>> - Statistics
>> - Benchmark reports
>> - TCO studies
>>
>> So go it and make our case :-)
>>
>>
> Sunil,
>
> 1. how much you will add for each line of source code published?
> 2. how much would you add for nurturing the collaborative culture among
> people?
> 3. how much would you add for self-reliance the nation/agency gains?
> 4. how much you would add for granting the freedom to use, study, modify
> and distribute?
>
> The paradigms of proprietary software don't match with free software, for
> there is no single yardstick.  Therefore they are incommensurable.
>
> You fell into the trap.
>
>  --
> GN
> http://metaStudio.org/ reShaping Education
>
>  TCO is a meaningless concept in case of proprietary software, where the
> user only gets a license to use. S/he has no rights over the software - in
> terms of studying, sharing and modifying /distrbibuting it. Such mere
> 'license to use' cannot constitute ownership, at the most it is a kind of
> tenancy right. Since there is no ownership possible in case of proprietary
> software, there is no question of TCO.
>
> I agree with GN - TCO is a red herring, in trying to compare ownership
> rights which FOSS gives vs tenancy rights of proprietary software.
>
>
May be Sunil should take this opportunity to raise such questions and state
that TCO is an incorrect measure for software, whether it is proprietary or
free software.

--
GN
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to