On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:06:06 +0530, Nagarjuna G wrote: 

>
2012/3/14 Guru गुरु 
> 
>> On 14/03/12 07:58, Nagarjuna G wrote: 
>>

>>> 2012/3/13 Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) 
>>> 
>>>> There are 5 types of
lies, increasing in degree in order of naming: 
>>>> ...
>>>> - TCO
studies
>>>> 
>>>> So go it and make our case :-)
>>> 
>>> Sunil, 
>>>

>>> 1. how much you will add for each line of source code published?

>>> .... -- 
>>> GN
>>> http://metaStudio.org/ [2] reShaping
Education
>> TCO is a meaningless concept in case of proprietary
software, where the user only gets a license to use. S/he has no rights
over the software - in terms of studying, sharing and modifying
/distrbibuting it. Such mere 'license to use' cannot constitute
ownership, at the most it is a kind of tenancy right. Since there is no
ownership possible in case of proprietary software, there is no question
of TCO. 
>> 
>> I agree with GN - TCO is a red herring, in trying to
compare ownership rights which FOSS gives vs tenancy rights of
proprietary software.
> 
> May be Sunil should take this opportunity to
raise such questions and state that TCO is an incorrect measure for
software, whether it is proprietary or free software.

For sure - our
report could also explain why TCO is an incorrect measure. We could
feature quotes from list members if they give us permission to do so. We
could also suggest ways in which TCO could be reframed to take into
account other factors. 

Finally 'lines of source' is also an important
issue for the Govt. I heard at the SecureIT conference first hand from a
senior Navy officer that the Microsoft sales team told them 'you can't
trust FOSS because Chinese hackers/developers submit code and have
introduced back-doors which could be exploited during a cyber-war.' Is
there any research or data available that will help us quantify
contributions to FOSS projects based on country? This would be useful in
dismantling this bit of FUD.  
  

Links:
------
[1]
mailto:[email protected]
[2] http://metaStudio.org/
[3]
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to