[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> I would also encourage you and your project team members to have
> your prelimary designs officially reviewed by PSARC (if you haven't
> done so already) and to get the ARCs opinion this, well before you are
> ready to line up for commitment review.
We will. That said, one of our team members is on PSARC, and other PSARC
members (such as Jim Carlson) have already been active in providing
feedback.
This comment disturbs me as it implies that by having someone from
the ARC as part of your team and providing feedback outside of the
ARC environment that there is some implicit approval here.
Whilst having such people on your team can help guide to a better
design, I can't imagine that it can be held up in place of review
by an ARC.
Is the implication here that all Solaris projects should have a PSARC
member as a part of their team so that they can cut down on requirements
in dealing with the ARC?
Jim, would you like to comment here, with your PSARC hat on?
Darren
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
