James Carlson writes:
> Looking at the code, it seems pretty clear that the author expects
> that 'set' doesn't change the return code value, and that the "-ne 0"
> is checking for failures out of /usr/sbin/route itself.
Ah, shoot, I'm a bonehead. Of course it works fine. This is just a
ksh93 bug and/or misfeature.
In /sbin/sh:
$ set -- `/bin/false`
$ echo $?
255
$ set -- `/bin/true`
$ echo $?
0
$
In ksh88:
$ set -- `/bin/false`
$ echo $?
255
$ set -- `/bin/true`
$ echo $?
0
$
In ksh93, it appears that this third case actually returns the
argument count rather than 0 for success.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
