James Carlson wrote: > ... > >In any event, I agree with having a discussion about the mailing lists >that are required. It sounds like you're voting to have a single wide >networking Community Group. > >
Yes. >But is it wide enough? Clearly, many networking-related things (such >as NFS and RPC) are nowhere to be found in our so-called "Networking >Community." That's quite odd, and as I mentioned before, actually >represents Sun's internal organization chart more than it does >anything technical about what we're trying to accomplish. > > Right. And I don't see how breaking up networking into further communities helps achieve anything except to create more communities. The problem "too hard to keep up with everything" is more of an indictment about how we're communicating. It's not clear to me that solving this problem is solved (or can only be solved) by carving up the networking community. Darren _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
