On (11/08/07 22:17), Rainer Heilke wrote:
>
> Yes, it does deserve a bit of thought, especially if it requires going
> outside of standard forms. It may help to know the various property types
> we may need to think about (like your zone example). Do you have some ideas
> about the various thinks it will need to cover?
>
we know that, today, there are 2 general properties, zone and autopush,
that apply to all links. The per link properties depend entirely on
the link type.. e.g. for tunnels we have properties like hop limit
and encaps limit, whereas for vnic's there are properties pertaining
to bandwidth management. So this is why I had envisioned "extended status"
to just display the status, and "Properties Settings" to correspond to
the {set,get}-linkprop sub-commands in dladm.
--Sowmini
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
