OK, Alta, Jan, and Nicolas, can you three help with a more precise and concise name for this doc project? We have dtrace-doc, smf-doc, starter-kit, glossary, muskoka, content, and pmpsm as live doc project names so far. So, pick something similar that works in a URL but makes more clear what the project is about. Maybe ntwk-drvr-doc? :) I really don't know, maybe we should involve mktg?! Just kidding.
Thanks, Michelle Darren Reed wrote: > James Carlson wrote: > > >> ... >> I'm really quite disappointed that a project proposal like this would >> meet with such opposition. >> >> > > The opposition I have is the name it is being given, which isn't > in line with what is being delivered/proposed. If one or the > other can be changed, I'd be happy. > > > >> Maybe what one of the senior folks >> commenting on this said was right -- that we shouldn't bother with the >> overhead involved in doing this on OpenSolaris, and should just cook >> up the documents on the SWAN, because we need them now, and the >> argument and delay required to get them going is not worth it. >> >> >> > > Isn't that always the case? > Doesn't less bureaucracy always result in things being > easier to deliver? > > Darren > > _______________________________________________ > docs-discuss mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
