G'Day Richard, On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:38:14AM -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > > G'Day Robert, > > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:44:02AM +0000, Robert > > Milkowski wrote: > > > Hello Brendan, > > > > > > > > > Great! > > > > > > Would it also properly work with pid, ppid, > > execname, etc. ? > > > > By the end of the plan, yes: > > > > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/dtrace/Network > > Provider/#Plan > > > > But not for this first step - ip:::{send|receive}. > > > > Associating IP events with processes is likely to > > depend on the > > packet IDs, socket provider and connection IDs. It's > > something > > that I really want to get done... > > > > Brendan > > Does that mean we can dream of a Solaris port of lsof that's > little more than a D script? :-)
No, we can dream of tools that do more than lsof can. By the completion of the network providers (especially step 13: /connfs), we will have stable connection info available - not just for the DTrace network providers, but also for other user land tools. Brendan -- Brendan [CA, USA] _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
