Huafeng Lu writes: > 篋\x8E 2008綛\xB410\xE6\x9C\x8824\xE6\x97\xA5 06:42, Darren Reed > \xE5\x86\x99\xE9\x81\x93: > > - further, please explain why it is preferable to not use SMF instances > > to facilitate support of VRRP instances/groups. This would seem to > > me like a natural marriage, yet the design being put forward does > > not take advantage of this. > > Can SMF service instances be created dynamically? The VRRP > instances/groups can be created/destroyed dynamically.
How "dynamic" must it be? You can create and destroy instances on the fly using libscf and/or svccfg. The advantage is making the administrative interfaces visible ... but it's possible there are disadvantages as well. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
_______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
