On 10/23/08 22:37, Huafeng Lu wrote:
于 2008年10月24日 06:42, Darren Reed 写道:
- the project as it is appears to deliver a single VRRP daemon that
serves all groups/instances that the host is participating in. Thus a
change in the configuration of one has the potential to affect all
others. Given this is a high-availability solution, is this wise?
How will the change of one's configuration affect others'?
If a change requires vrrpd to be restarted, it has to unjoin all of the
groups/instances it is in. Or maybe there is a problem with one of
the VRRP groups/instances that requires the daemon to be restarted.
In such a case, doing it for one impacts all.
Which highlights another point - behaviour of the service with respect
to refresh and restart needs to be discussed in the design document.
Darren
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
