On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:59 -0700, Sangeeta Misra wrote:
> I think we are getting away from the question which is handling of
> fragments critical for Phase 1 of ILB project. During identifying of
> critical features for ILB Phase 1, this one was not raised as a "must
> have" item.
> So I would like to find out whether this is considered to be a must
> have item for other protocols or not.
Note that fragment handling code targeted at a forwarding path already
exists in the solaris IP stack (it was added as part of the IPsec
"tunnel reform" project).
see
uts/common/inet/ip/spd.c:ipsec_fragcache_*()
it should be a SMOP to refactor it so that it can also be reused by a
loadbalancer.
- Bill
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
