James Carlson wrote: > Darren Reed writes: > >> I agrree, Jim, and I'd like to reiterate that we have an obligation to >> follow >> what the IEEE specification says is allowed here. Anything else introduces >> arbitrary restrictions that may introduce interoperability problems. >> > > What IEEE specification says something about security object names? I > thought these names (unlike the keys stored inside) were an internal > Solaris implementation detail, not something that conformed to any > standard. >
I should have quoted the entirity of your email where you were talking about how we're using the ESSID/BSSID for the secobj name. If we're not going to use those, then we don't need to be concerned with what IEEE says. But if we are, then we do. Darren _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
