On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 06:44:47AM -0500, James Carlson wrote:
> We'd probably be better off just to hash ESSID and BSSID together and
> use some printable form of the hash as the secobj name.
+1, though I'd say you may want to use both, H(BSSID || ESSID) and
H(ESSID) (if you find a secobj for this {BSSID, ESSID}, use that, else
if you find a secobj for theis {ESSID}, then use that, else, or if the
selected secobj fails, prompt for new creds).
Nico
--
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
