On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:44:42PM -0500, Peter Memishian wrote: > > > How about a free-form annotation for secobjs such that the old name > > becomes the annotation and the new name is randomly generated (OK, or a > > simple transformation of the old name)? Then NWAM could still match > > secobjs by checking the annotation. > > Live secobj information is stored in the kernel, so I'd rather not.
There's no all user-land code path that could be used by NWAM to find secobjs renamed by this change? And there couldn't be? Really? That said, I think this particular bit of incompatibility is something users can just deal with. Nico -- _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
