On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:11:21PM -0800, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> Of course, if you take Jim's suggesting to hold a ref for each
> taskq_dispatch, then you will never get to ipsecesp_ddi_destroy() with
> references around.
Perhaps, then, we do the same thing with esp_kcf_callback()? Currently,
there's an ipsec_{in,out}_stackid field that perhaps does not need to be
there if, and only if, we netstack_hold() before calling EF asynchronously.
So the fix becomes far more interesting than simply fixing the lock-held
problem. This is cool!
Thanks Jim and Erik!
Dan
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
