Girish M G writes: > Vasumathi Sundaram wrote: > > and the final incremental webrev is here: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vassun08/mdbmacro-webrev-r8 > > > > Could you please take a look before I file the RTI? > > > > Just a quick question. > > Should we categorize these status report as 'obsolete' within ndd(1M) > and print a message telling user to use 'mdb'?
I say ditch 'em. They're not the same thing as tunables, so the chance that anyone used them (successfully, that is) in a script or to set up a particular configuration is very low. The 'unknown' message should be just as informative as an 'obsolete' one -- driving the user to the man page. (Having an update for ndd(1M) that points out how to get status reports might not be a bad idea.) -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
