Cathy Zhou writes: > 2. It sounds like the bridge will be another class of data-links. So why > their observability nodes are not in /dev/net? Are you proposing a > different option (not "-d") for snoop to snoop a bridge instance? Can the > namespace of other data-links and the bridges (plumb the trailing '0') > overlap?
I've done some more thinking (and tinkering) with this. I now think that /dev/net/ is pretty well doable. I have some TRILL IS-IS changes that I need to finish up, but once I'm done with those, I'll do some experiments without the /dev/bridge/ directory. If it works ok, then that's just what I'll do. Thanks for the prodding ... -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
