Garrett D'Amore writes: > If you can be sure that none of the information is lost (data is > archived in an accessible location somewhere), then I'm OK with it. But > its a big -1 for deleting any "meaningful" data which is not published > elsewhere. (The top level pages for projects don't consist of > "meaningful data", but design documents and code reviews certainly *do*, > IMO.)
What's useful out of my old DHCPv6 project (which I'm planning to nuke either way)? Or out of the dead-and-gone "ethbridge" project? And haven't I said many times now that I wasn't planning to nuke any of the useful things? I'm just baffled that this isn't getting through. > If the XWiki team really wants us to clean up, they'll give us a way to > archive things. Has anyone asked them about the need for this? Not that I know of. The messages they've sent so far make it clear that they'd like to move less dead weight to the new site (rather than just finding a new location to store the dead weight), and that other than deletions, they don't want any substantial changes (so new project instantiation is going to get shut down for a while). However, it seems like the rough group consensus forming is that we'd like to hang onto our useless tchotchkes. Great. Less work for me, and, as I said, I've passed my point of caring. Have fun with those old pages. :-/ -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
