Peter Memishian writes: > > > However, it seems like the rough group consensus forming is that we'd > > like to hang onto our useless tchotchkes. Great. Less work for me, > > and, as I said, I've passed my point of caring. > > That's not quite the message I'm hearing. I haven't heard any objection > to removing abandoned project pages or project pages with no useful > content/links.
Garrett seems quite opposed. You also don't seem to agree with removal. That leaves me either fighting an uphill battle for no apparent reason, or just returning to more useful work. Since I'm stubborn, I'll try one final time. Can we pretty please get back to the original proposal without wandering off into random tangents, like IETF I-Ds? For each one of these projects, is there _any_ reason to keep them around? Please confine yourself to just this list. Don't comment on the state of Clearview or other projects. Just this list. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/dhcpv6-client/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ethbridge/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/network-sip/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/quagga/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/tref/ And for each one of these projects, should _any_ of them be on the former list? That is, are any similarly useless to keep around? http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/iscsitgt/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/pef/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/volo/ (If you want, you can ignore dhcpv6-client. I was the only contributor, I know the page is completely worthless, so I feel safe in just nuking it now.) -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
