James Carlson wrote:
Rick Jones writes:OK, but I reserve the right to revert it if the bug isn't fixed in an undefined "reasonable" timeframe :)Sounds like the right answer. I've bumped it to a P2 and moved it over to the group responsible. I think it's at least priority 2 because (a) it could easily represent a portability hazard and (b) it was previously thought fixed.
Thanks! Drew _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
