On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 04:07:37PM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I think fundamentally ARC has agreed with this, but in the past it was > somewhat confounded by the fact that wireshark had not yet integrated. > > I've not checked lately -- is wireshark integrated yet?
Yes, it has been. Although it seems that the bits needed to develop wireshark plugins (e.g., header files) are not shipped. > There's also the question of Solaris 10. If we don't have wireshark for > Solaris 10, then updates to snoop for new protocols made in S10 will > probably also need to be made for Nevada. That's going to be a small list of protocols. It'd be easier to ship wireshark for S10. > At the end of the day, this might mean that snoop isn't really quite in > the same level of maintenance mode that people would like -- they might > have to update *both* snoop and wireshark. I sure hope most i-teams don't have to. Nico -- _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
