On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 18:30 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Why does it matter whether the credentials are "real" or cached? > > > > > > Because cached credentials probably don't work on the net because they've > > > expired? > > > > In this model you get a new Kerberos ticket when the network becomes > > available (and also when the ticket expires): > > Call me silly, but which seems more straightforward to you?
Silly =) Seriously, what's the difference to the end user? As far as technical implementation I don't see using cached credentials to be less "straightforward" than trying to do network configuration before login.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
