On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:55 +0300, Tambet Ingo wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Pablo Martí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Tambet Ingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> No, but the argument type passed with the signal is not an integer, > >> it's NM_MODEM_GSM_NETWORK_MODE. That is, the same type that is used > >> for setting the network mode. And thus, that type needs all these > >> values. There is also no need to add another type which is just like > >> NETWORK_MODE, but doesn't include some of it's values. > > > > Oh yeah true. How about adding NO_SIGNAL, HSUPA and HSPA too? > > Dan already notified me that I'm missing HSPA. He also said we don't > need HSUPA for some reason (I don't remember why, Dan?).
Because there is no case where a modem supports HSUPA but not HSDPA, and thus HSUPA and HSPA are essentially equal. Since HSPA _is_ HSDPA + HSUPA, it's pointless to have a separate HSUPA. Dan > In which case would you need to send a "NetworkMode" changed signal > with NO_SIGNAL argument? I must be misunderstanding something as I'd > just not emit the signal in that case? > > Tambet > _______________________________________________ > NetworkManager-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
