-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:17 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Dan Williams wrote: >>> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote: >>>> Hey, Dan! >>>> Thanks for the advice. I am certainly keen on helping the community to >>>> solve the problem, but the bug had been reported to launchpad with >>>> like a dozen duplicates. The daily builds were suggested as partial >>>> fix but since then I could get no information from anywhere and bug >>>> reports on launchpad do not seem to be updated anymore. My friend was >>>> asking me whether he should install Karmic and I couldn't say "yes", >>>> since if his first GNU/Linux experience would be like that, I think >>>> this would not be a good thing. So eventually I decided to contact >>>> this mailing list directly, so that I can get some firsthand >>>> information. >>>> >>>> My dream would be to get a new version of NM. Uninstall this one, >>>> install this one and have it work normally like it did in 9.04 %) All >>>> apps get bugs like this one sometimes - I am not complaining. I just >>>> want to know if something is being done and if yes - when is a total >>>> fix planned? To me it is a serious blocker. >>> You can't realize that dream until we get some help in debugging the >>> issue so that we can fix the problem. We also can't do anything until >>> users help us debug the problem by answering the questions that I've >>> asked. >>> >>> Dan >> I have another one for Karmic, and I can do that as well. I've noticed >> that there does not seem to be any way to get it to pay any attention to >> an Ad-Hoc network. When I'm in range, the network appears in the >> knetworkmanager applet, but if I click on it, nothing happens (much the >> same as a hidden network did in a case we'd discussed in the past). I'm >> not sure what the debug info would say, but it should be interesting to >> find out. It looks like absolutely nothing happens at all. > > Can I get some /var/log/NetworkManager output from that? Based on that > we can enable wpa_supplicant debugging and find out from there.
Sure, I'll do it later tonight -- I'm not near that network for the time being. - -- ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer II |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[email protected] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/CST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksDFsYACgkQmb+gadEcsb7ZbACgiaqRSHe8h2iTcZ8IW9TiyDHF 6GwAoJWCaA805Wysecvwe0Yuj7eP9+7n =U7KX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<attachment: novosirj.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
