On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 14:22 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> What would you expect the routing table to look like in your case? I
> suppose we could do a default route for link-local. Not sure if that
> will confuse apps that expect a default route to mean an internet
> connection though.
I would expect the subnet route, as NM is creating already:
dest=169.254.0.0
gateway=0.0.0.0
genmask=255.255.0.0
I would also like the routing table to either include a default route:
dest=0.0.0
gateway=0.0.0.0
genmask=0.0.0.0
or a multicast one:
dest=224.0.0.0
gateway=0.0.0.0
genmask=240.0.0.0
The routing table that NM is setting up now is reasonable, in my
opinion, but there should be some way of customizing the behaviour in
the settings object.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
NetworkManager-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
