On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:08 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Patch looks good; lets push it into master, NM_0_8_1, and > NETWORKMANAGER_0_7 branches. And something else I found today, the > Fedora network scripts add a 169.254 route by default for IPv4 > connections even if they aren't LL-only. Not sure why or if that's > something we want to or why it was added to the Fedora initscripts in > the first place, but might be worth finding out.
Funny I asked the same thing awhile ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455186 On a different note, could your review the concept of creating multi-hop gateways that I filed at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171763 Think there might be some interest in having multiple gateways active with NM, is there? If so, would the above ifcfg layout be OK once the rh-plugin has the support? Sorry, I didn't take that idea farther then, too many packages to patch(NM being one of them), and I don't have the connections to get all the packages that touch the main routing table patched. On a side note, shorewall has been able to support multiple gateways for a while, with two distinct ways of configuring the routing tables, one using the "main" and the other using the "default" routing tables for the gateways, note the USE_DEFAULT_RT part, have a look at: http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html What's your take on the use of the routing tables? just some thoughts, Jerry _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
