On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:28 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:51 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > > However, the reason I dup in nm_system_get_link_type() is because due to > > the returning of the link reference there is a theoretical chance that > > the module which is behind the link type will be unloaded. libnl > > currently does not do so but that might happen in the future. > > > > It might be better to compare the return type against a list of known > > link types by NM and return a pointer to a type string owned by NM > > memory. Thoughts? > > Actually, I just changed this to returning an enum thus following your > initial suggestion.
Great, sounds fine, saves a memdup() too. Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
