> Pavel Simerda wrote: > > In my opinion, you should have just one binary. It is easy to > > detect systemd > > at runtime, as it requires cgroups and creates one. Symlink > > management is > > an overkill here. CK should be likewise very easy to detect. In > > absence of > > both, NetworkManager should still work. > > For the most part, I agree with you. > > I think the best argument against a single binary is that currently > for systemd support it must be linked against `libsystemd-login`, > which a non-systemd user might not have.
This is not an argument against a single binary at all. If you don't have the dependency, just don't build in the systemd part. You can even end up with a binary that supports neither of them, if applicable. > But really, that is a "long-term" change, I am advocating producing > both versions as they currently exist. What this patch does is the > same thing as if I built it twice with different configure flags; > there is no modification to NetworkManager itself, just the build > system. Yes, and I believe this sort of modification to the build system is unwelcome and the product of it (the two binaries) likewise. Pavel _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list