Hi Luke, could you please look at the following bug report, subscribe to Cc and comment?
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686997 Thank you in advance, Pavel ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Luke T. Shumaker" <[email protected]> > To: "Pavel Simerda" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Luke T. Shumaker" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:52:56 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH](or feature-request) build both systemd and ck versions > > At Thu, 18 Oct 2012 05:19:57 -0400 (EDT), > Pavel Simerda wrote: > > In my opinion, you should have just one binary. It is easy to > > detect systemd > > at runtime, as it requires cgroups and creates one. Symlink > > management is > > an overkill here. CK should be likewise very easy to detect. In > > absence of > > both, NetworkManager should still work. > > For the most part, I agree with you. > > I think the best argument against a single binary is that currently > for systemd support it must be linked against `libsystemd-login`, > which a non-systemd user might not have. > > But really, that is a "long-term" change, I am advocating producing > both versions as they currently exist. What this patch does is the > same thing as if I built it twice with different configure flags; > there is no modification to NetworkManager itself, just the build > system. > > ~ Luke Shumaker > _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
