On 26/10/12 14:08, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > So in this case we also don't have a port reported as 'MDM', but still > we have the NDIS port reported, and actually SETPORT says that NDIS is > enabled, which seems to be wrong. So, probably we cannot rely on that > reply and we should consider that if NDIS reported and no MDM reported, > always take the one reported as NDIS as data port... what do you think?
There's a new '06-huawei-simple' branch upstream which has a patch to try to fix the issue with the logic above. Can anyone who can reproduce the issue test it? -- Aleksander _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
