>> So in this case we also don't have a port reported as 'MDM', but still
>> > we have the NDIS port reported, and actually SETPORT says that NDIS is
>> > enabled, which seems to be wrong. So, probably we cannot rely on that
>> > reply and we should consider that if NDIS reported and no MDM reported,
>> > always take the one reported as NDIS as data port... what do you think?
> There's a new '06-huawei-simple' branch upstream which has a patch to
> try to fix the issue with the logic above.
> 
> Can anyone who can reproduce the issue test it?

Patch merged to both MM_06 and git master, after several successful
tests from different users.

-- 
Aleksander
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to