On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 11:34 -0400, Pavel Simerda wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Colin Walters" <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:25:31 PM > > Subject: discuss: NM server defaults > > > > So I filed this downstream: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978081 > > I think it might be useful to consider this upstream as well.
Yep, see: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~walters/NetworkManager/commit/?h=wip/serverconf > Sounds like a useful default for specific class of usage. I, personally, > would prefer the server to react on carrier at least when using DHCP. So both you and danw didn't say *why*. My guess here is that in a server situation, we don't want to down the interface and request a new DHCP lease for a brief cable plug + unplug? If an admin accidentally unplugs the wrong one? > So this might actually be an area where we as developers don't know yet > whether it is preferable and by which groups of people. Right, that's the goal of this thread. Review of above branch appreciated. _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
