Hi,
As already observed in the thread "dhcpv6-problem" some devices are confused
by option request dhcpv6.server-id.
I looked a little bit in to RFC 3736 and 3315. But I still don't know what is
correct.
Do you need the server-id, in case they are more than one servers in your LAN?
Is a empty server-id request a valid request? ( in case of a selection: does
empty mean all or nothing?)
Why doesn't windows send this request?
Because I don't see any disadvantages I propose to remove this request.
At the moment I know three devices which would work with this patch.
ZTE 823D
ZTEMF93E
alcatel one touch W800Z (tct-mobile) alias Telekom Speedsick LTE IV
and I don't know any device which would stop working.
Regards,
Thomas Schäfer
diff -ur a/NetworkManager-0.9.10/src/dhcp-manager/nm-dhcp-dhclient-utils.c b/NetworkManager-0.9.10/src/dhcp-manager/nm-dhcp-dhclient-utils.c
--- a/NetworkManager-0.9.10/src/dhcp-manager/nm-dhcp-dhclient-utils.c 2014-07-04 02:32:13.000000000 +0200
+++ b/NetworkManager-0.9.10/src/dhcp-manager/nm-dhcp-dhclient-utils.c 2014-07-16 22:00:08.333854069 +0200
@@ -225,7 +225,6 @@
add_also_request (alsoreq, "dhcp6.name-servers");
add_also_request (alsoreq, "dhcp6.domain-search");
add_also_request (alsoreq, "dhcp6.client-id");
- add_also_request (alsoreq, "dhcp6.server-id");
} else {
add_ip4_config (new_contents, dhcp_client_id, hostname);
add_also_request (alsoreq, "rfc3442-classless-static-routes");
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
