On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 22:38 +0200, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > Hi, > > As already observed in the thread "dhcpv6-problem" some devices are confused > by option request dhcpv6.server-id. > > I looked a little bit in to RFC 3736 and 3315. But I still don't know what is > correct. > Do you need the server-id, in case they are more than one servers in your LAN? > > Is a empty server-id request a valid request? ( in case of a selection: does > empty mean all or nothing?) > > Why doesn't windows send this request? > > Because I don't see any disadvantages I propose to remove this request. > > At the moment I know three devices which would work with this patch. > ZTE 823D > ZTEMF93E > alcatel one touch W800Z (tct-mobile) alias Telekom Speedsick LTE IV > > and I don't know any device which would stop working. > > Regards, > Thomas Schäfer
Thanks for tracking this down! I've pushed this to git master, 0.9.10, and 0.9.8. Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
