Hi Thomas Am 25.11.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Thomas Haller: > On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 09:45 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 02:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Hi >> >>> Shouldn't libnm.pc have >>> Requires: NetworkManager >= 1.0.8 >> >> Yeah maybe, I dunno. Lubomir? > > Ah, got it now... > > As detailed before, NetworkManager in this case means > "NetworkManager.pc" which is part of the legacy libraries. > libnm.pc is self-contained and has no requirements on other > NetworkManager libraries. > > Thus it's correct to have no "Requires".
As I tried to explain, /usr/include/libnm/nm-version.h (from libnm) does actually include a header from a legacy library. So it would be broken without the legacy headers being installed. So, either #include <nm-version-macros.h> is dropped from /usr/include/libnm/nm-version.h, or libnm.pc get's Requires on NetworkManager.pc. Regards, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
