On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 16:12 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 10:06 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > Thomas, > > > > Do you think it's worth backporting th/supplicant-manager-fix-ref- > > count-rh1298007 to nm-1-0? I was just looking at https://bugzilla. > > re > > dh > > at.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241198 and maybe that branch fixes the bug > > there. The only other plausible reason would be memory corruption. > > But 1.0 would benefit from that fix too. What do you think? > > > > Hi Dan, > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298007#c19 > > There is already a workaround for the crash on nm-1-0 [1]. > > I only noticed that later, and already did the backport. Don't know > we > want to merge it though(?!). See th/supplicant-manager-fix-ref-count- > rh1298007-nm-1-0 branch.
backports merged to nm-1-0: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=1fe054d31905935f2d034042b15217b7b411f46a I did not backport https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=1264fc210822ec80408fe7d8451297fedee70881 because it was complicated and didn't seem necessary. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
