On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 22:43 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On 14.05.2022 22:24, Thomas Haller wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 07:38 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov via
> > networkmanager-
> > list wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The background is a security requirement. Unused interfaces
> > > > must
> > > > ideally remain disabled at the physical layer when a cable is
> > > > plugged
> > > > in. Ideally, the LEDs would also remain dark.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > It sounds like
> > > 
> > > no-auto-default=*
> > > 
> > > mostly does what you want.
> > 
> > 
> > that option merely disables that NetworkManager will automatically
> > generate a profile for ethernet devices, that don't have a profile
> > yet.
> > Such profiles are called "Wired connection 1", which is how you can
> > recognize it.
> > 
> > This does very little magic, you can manually create a profile to
> > the
> > same effect. In any case, NetworkManager would have already set the
> > interface IFF_UP at this point -- regardless of "(no-)auto-
> > default".
> > 
> 
> Sure, but usual question is - what are the expected threats? Simply
> having interface up does not hurt anyone (except may be audit
> company).
> But having automatic profile on interface allows someone to connect
> PC
> with DHCP server and so get known IP address to (attempt to) access
> the
> server. This is prevented by no-auto-default.
> 

you are right!

Thomas

_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to