On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> (threaded mpm only; no idea about perchild)
>
> ThreadsPerChild currently includes the implicit signal thread.
>
> I am -0 on it including the signal thread (i.e., I don't like that you
> get 49 worker threads when you code ThreadsPerChild=50).
>
> I raise the issue not because I feel so strongly about it but that
> there is a small bug to fix, and depending on whether or not
> ThreadsPerChild should include the signal thread the bug will be fixed
> differently.
ThreadsPerChild should NOT include the signal thread. That directive
talks about how many worker threads you have, not total threads.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
