[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Nope. We want to create ThreadsPerChild threads to serve pages.
> Previously, we did:
>
> for 1 to ap_threads_per_child
> create_thread(worker_thread)
> handle_signals
>
> Now we do:
>
> create_thread(handle_singnals)
> for 1 to ap_threads_per_child -1
> create_thread(worker_thread)
> worker_thread
>
> If we don't have the -1, then we will have created 1 too many worker
> threads.
I got it finally :)
Thanks!
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
- ThreadsPerChild - should it include the implicit si... Jeff Trawick
- Re: ThreadsPerChild - should it include the im... rbb
- Re: ThreadsPerChild - should it include th... Jeff Trawick
- Re: ThreadsPerChild - should it include th... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: ThreadsPerChild - should it includ... dean gaudet
- Re: ThreadsPerChild - should it in... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: ThreadsPerChild - should ... dean gaudet
- Re: ThreadsPerChild - sho... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: ThreadsPerChild -... rbb
- Re: ThreadsPerChild -... Jim Jagielski
- Re: ThreadsPerChild -... Bill Stoddard
- Re: ThreadsPerChild -... Rodent of Unusual Size
