> Doesn't this remove the advantage of using apr_time_t's?  The whole point
> of that format was that we were using microseconds instead of seconds.  If
> that is our goal, then why don't we just change what an apr_time_t is?
>

apr_time_t should maintain 1 microsecond resolution (there are legit uses for
it).  Reducing resolutions should be a runtime or compile time option for
folks who want speed at the expense of function.

Bill

Reply via email to