> I have to agree. Regressing function that once worked, is usually a bad
idea.
> Bill
Yep.
Just 'do the right thing' in the codebase and actually have a
patch hanging around ( and freely available ) called
'patch_to_do_the_wrong_thing_so_Webfolders_will_work.pat'.
That way... no one can accuse you of not 'supporting' something but
if anyone is crazy enough to continually apply a patch that is actually
named 'do_the_wrong_thing' then, well... whadda ya gonna do.
Yours
Kevin Kiley
CTO, Remote Communciations, Inc.
* Original message
> > And therein lies the biggest dilemma of all... do you follow the RFC's or
> > fix a Microsoft bug... my vote... follow the RFC's and comment the lines
> > where the patch needs to go and then show them what the patch is.
> >
> > You now have achieved two critical things...
> >
> > 1. Followed the RFC's
> > 2. Supported the customer which in turn will get them to continue using
> the
> > product.
> >
> > A win win for the ASF, which can only be a good thing.
> >
>
> I have to agree. Regressing function that once worked, is usually a bad
idea.
> Bill
